رخص برمجيات حرة متساهلة

رخص البرمجيات الحرة المتساهلة (بالإنجليزية: Permissive free software licences)‏ هي رخص برمجيات حرة للأعمال ذات حقوق النسخ، تقدم العديد من نفس الحريات كما لو تم نشر العمل في الملكية العامة.^[1]^[2]^[3] أحد الأمثلة المنتشرة على الرخص المتساهلة هي رخصة MIT ورخصة بي إس دي.

مراجع

^ Hanwell، Marcus D. (28 يناير 2014). "Should I use a permissive license? Copyleft? Or something in the middle?". opensource.com. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2017-07-07. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2015-05-30. Permissive licensing simplifies things One reason the business world, and more and more developers [...], favor permissive licenses is in the simplicity of reuse. The license usually only pertains to the source code that is licensed and makes no attempt to infer any conditions upon any other component, and because of this there is no need to define what constitutes a derived work. I have also never seen a license compatibility chart for permissive licenses; it seems that they are all compatible.
^ "Top 20 licenses". Black Duck Software. 19 نوفمبر 2015. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2013-09-04. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2015-11-19. 1. MIT license 24%, 2. GNU General Public License (GPL) 2.0 23%, 3. Apache License 16%, 4. GNU General Public License (GPL) 3.0 9%, 5. BSD License 2.0 (3-clause, New or Revised) License 6%, 6. GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL) 2.1 5%, 7. Artistic License (Perl) 4%, 8. GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL) 3.0 2%, 9. Microsoft Public License 2%, 10. Eclipse Public License (EPL) 2%
^ permissive on opensource.org "A "permissive" license is simply a non-copyleft open source license – one that guarantees the freedoms to use, modify, and redistribute, but that permits برمجيات احتكارية derivatives." نسخة محفوظة 22 سبتمبر 2018 على موقع واي باك مشين.

هذه بذرة مقالة عن الحاسوب أو العاملين في هذا المجال، بحاجة للتوسيع. فضلًا شارك في تحريرها.

[1] Hanwell، Marcus D. (28 يناير 2014). "Should I use a permissive license? Copyleft? Or something in the middle?". opensource.com. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2017-07-07. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2015-05-30. Permissive licensing simplifies things One reason the business world, and more and more developers [...], favor permissive licenses is in the simplicity of reuse. The license usually only pertains to the source code that is licensed and makes no attempt to infer any conditions upon any other component, and because of this there is no need to define what constitutes a derived work. I have also never seen a license compatibility chart for permissive licenses; it seems that they are all compatible.

[2] "Top 20 licenses". Black Duck Software. 19 نوفمبر 2015. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2013-09-04. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2015-11-19. 1. MIT license 24%, 2. GNU General Public License (GPL) 2.0 23%, 3. Apache License 16%, 4. GNU General Public License (GPL) 3.0 9%, 5. BSD License 2.0 (3-clause, New or Revised) License 6%, 6. GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL) 2.1 5%, 7. Artistic License (Perl) 4%, 8. GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL) 3.0 2%, 9. Microsoft Public License 2%, 10. Eclipse Public License (EPL) 2%

[3] rmissive on opensource.org "A "permissive" license is simply a non-copyleft open source license – one that guarantees the freedoms to use, modify, and redistribute, but that permits برمجيات احتكارية derivatives." نسخة محفوظة 22 سبتمبر 2018 على موقع واي باك مشين.

[1]

[2]

[3]