ويكيبيديا:ترشيحات المقالات المختارة/أحمد بن حنبل: الفرق بين النسختين
تم حذف المحتوى تمت إضافة المحتوى
لا ملخص تعديل |
reply |
||
سطر 47:
<div dir=ltr>
First and the foremost I would like to thank you for your efforts in writing this article. Second, sorry for writing in English. I saw this discussion by accident and I liked the article overall; here are my two cents:
:* Melchert, Christopher (1 January 1997). "[http://www.jstor.org/stable/4057347 The Adversaries of Aḥmad Ibn ḥanbal]". Arabica '''44''' (2): 234–253.
Regards, [[مستخدم:طاها|طاها]] ([[نقاش المستخدم:طاها|نقاش]]) 20:17، 27 نوفمبر 2013 (ت ع م)
:Thank you for your comment brother Taha. I don't know what do you mean by primary sources, for all sources I have used are good and reliable. I didnt find any criticism against imam Ahmad's hadith, if you found any examples I will be glad to add them to this article. It is true that the article is overly positive about Imam Ahmad but that's only because this is all I have found in my resources. Thanks again.--<span style=" font-size: 20px; text-shadow: grey 0.2em 0.1em 0.2em;"><font color="#996515">[[مستخدم:السيف ذو الوشاح|'''الـسّـيْـف''']]</font><sup>[[نقاش المستخدم:السيف ذو الوشاح|''راسلني'']]</sup></span> 12:29، 28 نوفمبر 2013 (ت ع م)▼
▲Thank you for your comment brother Taha. I don't know what do you mean by primary sources, for all sources I have used are good and reliable. I didnt find any criticism against imam Ahmad's hadith, if you found any examples I will be glad to add them to this article. It is true that the article is overly positive about Imam Ahmad but that's only because this is all I have found in my resources. Thanks again.--<span style=" font-size: 20px; text-shadow: grey 0.2em 0.1em 0.2em;"><font color="#996515">[[مستخدم:السيف ذو الوشاح|'''الـسّـيْـف''']]</font><sup>[[نقاش المستخدم:السيف ذو الوشاح|''راسلني'']]</sup></span> 12:29، 28 نوفمبر 2013 (ت ع م)
::Thank you for your response brother Sayf.
::# By primary source, loosely speaking, the people who have witnessed Ahmad and written about him. Analysis of these sources important. Encyclopedia of Islam has a paragraph like this. Or, consider the section "Sources for Muhammad's life" in [[:en:Muhammad]] (pbuh).
::# In [[:en:Musnad Ahmad ibn Hanbal]] the authors has written that ''"Certain Hanbali scholars, such as Abu'l-Faraj ibn al-Jawzi claimed that the Musnad contains hadiths that are fabricated by interpolation."'' I have not checked this claim by myself, but given ahadith like "قسيم الجنة والنار" I am pretty sure that some scholars will have doubts about the Musnad.
::# I still believe that, based on [[:en:Wikipedia:Overquoting]], many of the quotes should be moved to wikiquote.
::Thank you, [[مستخدم:طاها|طاها]] ([[نقاش المستخدم:طاها|نقاش]]) 18:22، 28 نوفمبر 2013 (ت ع م)
</div>
|